.NET

.NET development for companies already living in Microsoft

We build with .NET when the company already runs Microsoft identity, Azure, or a stack of internal tools in C#. ASP.NET is the usual web and API framework. The result is a system your existing administrators can recognise.

  • ASP.NET applications
  • Microsoft integration
  • Azure hosting
  • Modernisation

What we build

Internal portals, partner APIs, and line-of-business applications with roles mapped to the identity you already use. Background jobs and reporting sit beside the request path so a long export does not freeze a screen.

When we would not start here

A product company with a Node or Python team and no Microsoft estate does not gain much by adopting .NET for fashion. A data and model heavy product may still keep Python for that slice and .NET for the application, if the boundary is clean.

.NET when the business already lives there

A good fit

  • Existing .NET systems and skills
  • Line-of-business workflow
  • Windows-heavy operations you must keep

A poor reason

  • A greenfield prototype with a Java team
  • A public marketing site
  • A rewrite of a healthy service

What changes a .NET build

01

The generation

A current .NET service and a legacy Framework app are different plans.

02

The host

Azure is common and not required. We name where it will run.

03

The boundary

Identity and the database you already have usually stay. The new module integrates.

Before a .NET service

  1. 01

    The generation

    Current .NET, or a Framework app you must extend.

  2. 02

    Identity

    The Microsoft directory you already use, if any.

  3. 03

    The host

    Azure or another place. Name it.

  4. 04

    The operators

    People who can read the service after an incident.

Marks .NET belongs with this estate

  1. 01

    It matches the estate

    The reason is the Microsoft systems, the team, or both.

  2. 02

    The directory is used

    Sign-in uses the company identity that already exists, when that is the point.

  3. 03

    It posts onward

    A module writes to the system that owns the record, instead of becoming a second ledger.

  4. 04

    They can deploy

    The team that will live with it can build and release it.

What we build

ASP.NET applications

Server-rendered or API-backed apps with a permission model tied to real roles.

Microsoft integration

Entra ID, Microsoft 365, and the file and mail flows your staff already use.

Azure hosting

A deployment that matches the Azure page, in an account you own.

Modernisation

A careful move off unsupported .NET Framework where the risk justifies it.

Questions we hear

Do you still work on .NET Framework?

For maintenance and a planned move. New products go on current .NET unless a constraint forces otherwise.

Can you work with our SQL Server?

Yes. We do not introduce a second database for style if SQL Server is already the operational store.

Is this the same as Azure?

No. .NET runs elsewhere too. The Azure page is about the platform. Many of our .NET systems are hosted there because the client already is.