Automation

AI automation for documents, triage, and the steps between systems

AI automation applies a model to a step you can check: classifying a request, reading a document into fields, or routing work. The surrounding workflow is ordinary software, with a queue for the cases the model should not finish alone.

  • Document intake
  • Triage
  • Draft-and-wait
  • Monitoring

Automate the step, not the department

Good candidates are high volume and easy to sample: inbound emails, supplier invoices, application forms, listing descriptions, support tags. Poor candidates are rare, high-stakes decisions with no historical examples. We measure accuracy on a held-out sample before anyone turns off the old process.

Straight-through only when the error is cheap

If a wrong field creates a wrong payment, a person confirms it. If a wrong tag only mis-files a newsletter, straight-through processing may be fine. That threshold is a business decision we write down, not a default of “fully automated”.

A routine step with a review

Automated

  • Intake of one document type
  • A suggested class or route
  • A queue when confidence is low

Still reviewed

  • Payments and legal commitments
  • Exceptions you have not listed
  • A silent write into finance

What changes an automation

01

The trigger

An inbox, an upload, and a status change are different starts.

02

The write

Suggesting a field is smaller than saving it. Say which one this release does.

03

The exception

The interesting work is the case the rule does not cover. Give it an owner.

What an automation brief needs

  1. 01

    The trigger

    An inbox, an upload, or a status change.

  2. 02

    The document

    One type, with two real examples.

  3. 03

    The write

    Suggest a field, or save it. They are different.

  4. 04

    The exception

    Who owns the case the rule does not cover.

Marks an automation can be trusted

  1. 01

    The trigger is real

    It starts from an event in a system, not from a person remembering to run it.

  2. 02

    A failure shows

    A step that did not complete is visible, with the record it touched.

  3. 03

    A person can pause

    Someone can stop the flow without taking the system down.

  4. 04

    The audit is there

    Who, when, and which record are written for each run.

What we build

Document intake

Fields extracted from PDFs and scans, with a confidence score and a correction screen.

Triage

Routing to the right queue, using the text and the customer record.

Draft-and-wait

A prepared update that a person sends, for the actions you will not fully automate.

Monitoring

A view of volume, corrections, and the categories that keep failing.

How an engagement runs

  1. 01

    Sample the pile

    A few hundred real items, including the ugly ones.

  2. 02

    Shadow the current team

    The model suggests. People still act. You compare.

  3. 03

    Automate the confident slice

    The rest stay in the queue, and the threshold is adjustable.

Questions we hear

Is this RPA?

Screen-clicking robots are a last resort. We prefer APIs and documents. Where a legacy system has no interface, a careful automation may still be justified, and we will say what it will cost to keep alive.

Can you automate sales follow-up?

Drafting and reminders, yes. Sending unsupervised commercial claims, no. See AI agents for the approval pattern.

How does this relate to business automation software?

The solution page covers workflow products. This page covers the AI step inside them. Many projects need both.