Sample · Commerce

Sample: a multi-vendor marketplace with commission designed first

This sample is a marketplace for a company that wants several sellers on one checkout. Commission, payout reporting, and what happens when one seller is late are specified before the theme. It is not a launched store.

Sample solution. This describes a concept we use to show the shape of a build. It is not a client engagement and it is not a result from a completed customer project.

Why the concept starts with money rules

Marketplaces fail when the first vendor is invited before anyone can explain a refund that involves two sellers. The sample fixes commission, who pays the gateway fee, and how a partial shipment is shown to the buyer.

First release

Ten invited sellers, one category, card payment through a gateway the operator contracts, and an admin view of orders by seller. Self-serve seller onboarding and advertising products wait. Arabic and English catalogue fields are in the first release if the buyers need both.

Platform choice

The concept can sit on a commerce platform or a custom core. The e-commerce service page explains how that choice is made. The sample does not pretend one stack is mandatory.

Orders when more than one seller exists

The sample covers

  • A seller and their stock
  • An order that can split
  • A payout status someone can explain

A real marketplace still needs

  • The actual sellers
  • The payment provider’s rules
  • Support for a failed split

The hard part of this shape

01

The split

One checkout and many parcels is the product. A single warehouse is a simpler shop.

02

The money

Who is paid, and when, has to be written before the theme.

03

The dispute

A missing item needs an owner. The sample leaves that queue explicit.

If this shape fits a marketplace

  1. 01

    The sellers

    How many, and who sets their stock.

  2. 02

    The split

    One checkout, many parcels. Confirm that is the point.

  3. 03

    The payout

    Who is paid, and when.

  4. 04

    The dispute

    Who owns a missing item.

Marks this marketplace sample stays structural

  1. 01

    It is a sample

    No marketplace brand and no turnover are claimed.

  2. 02

    Seller and stock

    Each seller’s items and orders stay theirs.

  3. 03

    Payout is the hard part

    The lesson is splitting an order and paying the seller, not the storefront.

  4. 04

    No volume is invented

    Order counts are not added to make the sample look live.